I’ve previously prepared a set of rights which restricts what Congress should not be permitted to do.
These restrictions, of course, extend thusly to any individual that would be known as good.
1. A good individual shall not violate the right to life of a second individual, except as consequence of a violation or attempted or credibly threatened violation of the right to life by that second individual of the good or any other individual.
2. A good individual shall not violate the right to liberty of a second individual, except as consequence of a violation or attempted or credibly threatened violation of the rights to life or liberty by that second individual of the good or any other individual.
3. A good individual shall not violate the right to pursuit of happiness of a second individual, except as consequence of a violation or attempted or credibly threatened violation of the rights to life, liberty, or pursuit of happiness of the good or any other individual.
In depth descriptions of these rights can be found in preious posts, and of course, in order to qualify as good, an individual must be capable of establishing facts objectively. If an individual steals from you in a dream or vision, you are evil if you act as if that is a violation of your rights by that individual. Similarly, if you accept the claims of othersin the abscence of confirming evidence in regards to violations of rights, then attempting to remain within these guidelines can still leave you acting evil.
